Wednesday, March 19, 2014

 GLOBAL WARMING ALARMIST NUTS TAKE NOTE: U.S. LIKELY TO HAVE COLDEST SPRING IN 50 YEARS:

Arctic blast coming to Eastern US – likely to be the coldest opening to calendar spring in at least 50 years... http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/03/17/eastern-us-arctic-blast-coming-likely-to-be-the-coldest-opening-to-calender-spring-in-at-least-50-years/



Nationally-known meteorologist Joe Bastardi: "I am 58...never seen anything close to this for late March. The pattern next week has as much extreme potential for the time of the year as I can find. Coldest opening to calender spring in 50 yrs at least." 

https://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/445640564071858177/photo/1






All the while, as the data for Global Cooling keeps rolling in:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/deep-freeze-midwest-prepares-50-article-1.1567597

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/03/04/by-one-measure-2014-winter-is-now-coldest-ever/


http://www.crh.noaa.gov/news/display_cmsstory.php?wfo=dlh&storyid=99873&source=0






Global Warming Alarmist Nuts reorganize: 

 http://climatenexus.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/AAAS-What-We-Know_3.17.14.pdf








To AAAS: What we know? Earth hasn’t warmed significantly in over a decade, climate models failed to predict this...

http://www.c3headlines.com/global-cooling-dataevidencetrends/






‪#‎ClimateCounterConsensus‬ ‪#‎Winter2013‬ ‪#‎GlobalCooling‬ ‪#‎RecordCold‬ ‪#‎Temperatures‬ ‪#‎CO2IsNotAPoulltant‬ ‪#‎GlobalWarmingAlarmism‬ ‪#‎ClimateDepot‬ ‪#‎ImpeachObama‬ ‪#‎ClimateGateII‬ ‪#‎ClimateChangeHoax‬ ‪#‎IPCC‬ ‪#‎ScienceSaysNo‬ ‪#‎ScienceSaysSo‬ ‪#‎LubošMotl‬ ‪#‎JudithCurry‬ ‪#‎MilankovitchCycles‬ ‪#‎SolarMaximum‬ ‪#‎SolarMinimum


https://www.facebook.com/groups/DailyGlobalWarmingHoaxReport/


 https://twitter.com/GlobWarmHoax

Saturday, March 15, 2014

SHATTERING THE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS MYTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING:



 

That Scientific Global Warming Consensus That Never Was! Consensus momentum regarding action on climate change? Phony, contrived talking points, unscientific propositions, and a scorn for truth wrapped in false threats? Yes, he’s entirely correct on both accounts… but in the exact opposite direction that he, supported by representations in the “mainstream media”, has indicated.

Leftard Washington Post op-ed writer Richard Cohen scorned then-presidential candidate Rick Perry for publicly stating that he stood with an increasing number of scientists who have challenged the existence of man-made global warming threats. According to Cohen, “There were some, of course, just as there are some scientists who are global warming skeptics, but these few- about 2% of climate researchers- could hold their annual meeting in a phone booth, if there are any left. (Perhaps 2% of scientists think they are).” Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists.

So where did that famous “consensus” claim that “98% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. Of the about 3.000 who responded, 82% answered “yes” to the second question, which like the first, most people I know would also have agreed with.

Then of those, only a small subset, just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals, were considered in their survey statistic. That “98% all scientists” referred to a laughably puny number of 75 of those 77 who answered “yes”.


Finally, although any 98% climate consensus is 100% baloney, this is something all reasonable scientists should really agree about.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/17/that-scientific-global-warming-consensus-not/











97% CONSENSUS? NO! GLOBAL WARMING MATH MYTHS & SOCIAL PROOFS... “97% Consensus? No! Global Warming Math Myths and Social Proofs” revealing that only 1-3% of scientists in 3 of 4 "consensus" surveys explicitly agree with the IPCC extreme declaration on global warming. Scientific evidence at the joint NOAA/NASA press conference Jan. 21, 2014 shows no global warming in 16+ years despite a rise in carbon dioxide (CO2); as climate models continue to fail, the Dutch government calls for the IPCC reform to include natural factors, not limited to human-induced climate change. http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf?vsmaid=398

#ClimateCounterConsensus #Winter2013 #GlobalCooling #RecordCold #Temperatures #CO2IsNotAPoulltant #GlobalWarmingAlarmism #ClimateDepot #ImpeachObama #ClimateGateII #ClimateChangeHoax #IPCC #ScienceSaysNo #ScienceSaysSo #LubošMotl #JudithCurry #MilankovitchCycles #SolarMaximum #SolarMinimun


https://www.facebook.com/groups/DailyGlobalWarmingHoaxReport/

https://twitter.com/GlobWarmHoax