UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL WARMING ALARMIST CRACKPOT PREDICTIONS NOT COMING TRUE...
Earth Gets 15 Year Reprieve From Climate Doom?!: UN in 1989: World has a
’10-year window of opportunity to solve’ global warming — Now in 2013:
‘UN needs global warming answer by 2015′
http://www.climatedepot.com/
FLASHBACK 2009: Obama 'has four years to save Earth'
US must take the lead to avert eco-disaster. Guess what, it's almost 2014 and...NOTHING HAPPENED!
http://www.theguardian.com/
Climate Realist Marc Morano uses real climate science and rips NASA’s
James Hansen a new A-Hole: ‘Hansen said we only have 4 years left to
save the planet in Jan.2009, We passed another Mayan calendar deadline’ http://www.youtube.com/
Global warming activist scientists may not be the first to proclaim a
doomsday year of 2047 as the end of time! — 2047 is the new 2012 — but
global warming activists were beaten to Armageddon! AP: 'Temperatures Go
Off the Charts Around 2047' http://newsbusters.org/blogs/
World to roast by 2047, film at 11. No word on whether Harold Camping
has approved the date yet…Study in Nature reveals urgent new time frame
for climate change...Under a business-as-usual scenario, the index shows
the average location on Earth will experience a radically different
climate by 2047. http://wattsupwiththat.com/
However, there are REAL problems with long range (20+ year) climate computer model forecasts...
The normally Alarmist-friendly New York Times goes skeptic on
end-of-climate-by-2047 study: Based on models with ‘acknowledged
problems’ and uncertain accuracy...
"Scientists from the
University of Hawaii at Manoa calculated that by 2047, plus or minus
five years, the average temperatures in each year will be hotter across
most parts of the planet than they had been at those locations in any
year between 1860 and 2005...The research comes with caveats. It is
based on climate models, huge computer programs that attempt to
reproduce the physics of the climate system and forecast the future
response to greenhouse gases. Though they are the best tools available,
these models contain acknowledged problems, and no one is sure how
accurate they will prove to be at peering many decades ahead."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/
AGW Alarmist United Nations Intergovernmental Panel (IPCC) on Climate
Change lead author Hans von Storch told 'Der Spiegel' that climate
models are having a difficult time replicating the lack of global
warming during the past 15 years.
“So far, no one has been able to
provide a compelling answer to why climate change seems to be taking a
break. We’re facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen
even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate
models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees
Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) over the past 10 years. That hasn’t
happened. In fact, the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06
degrees Celsius (0.11 degrees Fahrenheit) — a value very close to zero.
This is a serious scientific problem."
http://www.spiegel.de/
http://news.heartland.org/
“The nature of science is to go where the data tells you to go, not to
go where you believe you should, and that is what von Storch is doing as
a scientist,” ~Meteorologist Anthony Watts
EXCELLENT POINT: So why is anyone giving these highly unreliable climate models any credence?!
